Just the other day, several criticisms were directed at the Unity Party for naming its Campaign Team. Most of the critics were from the Congress for Democratic Change (CDC) now headed by Cllr. Winston Tubman after many years of denial that its former leader, Ambassador George Weah was not a presidential material for Liberia. Here are some of the things the critics said:
- The naming of Eugene Nagbe on the Team was bogus
- The Team will not deliver the presidency to H. E. Ellen John Sirleaf
- The naming of a Clergyman as a bridged of the neutrality of the Church in Liberia's political affairs. Thank God the Unity Party withdrew the Clergyman.
The question is, if all of the above assertions are true including count three which is true, of what benefit is to the opposition parties, especially the CDC, that the Unity Party's Campaign Team will not bring home the result needed in the 2011 General Elections. Is this just criticism for the sake of criticising or there was nothing to say to the partisans?
No comments:
Post a Comment